​”Eclecticism vs. Allopathy” by E. Melvin McPheron offers a critical examination of the contrasting medical philosophies of Eclecticism and Allopathy. Eclecticism, rooted in the 19th-century American medical movement, emphasizes individualized treatment using a combination of botanical remedies, lifestyle adjustments, and natural therapies. This approach focuses on understanding the patient’s unique constitution and treating the root causes of illness rather than merely alleviating symptoms. In contrast, Allopathy, the foundation of modern Western medicine, relies heavily on pharmaceutical interventions and surgical procedures to address disease symptoms.​

McPheron delves into the historical development of both systems, highlighting how Eclecticism emerged as a response to the limitations and side effects associated with Allopathic practices. The Eclectic movement sought to integrate beneficial aspects of various medical traditions, including herbalism and holistic health practices, to provide more personalized and less invasive treatments. This philosophy aligns with the belief that the body possesses an inherent ability to heal itself when supported by appropriate natural therapies.​

The book also critiques the mechanistic and often impersonal nature of Allopathic medicine, which tends to treat diseases in isolation without considering the broader context of a patient’s overall health and well-being. McPheron argues that this approach can lead to over-reliance on medications and procedures, sometimes at the expense of addressing underlying lifestyle factors and emotional health.​